I greatly admire Countee Cullen. He was a phenomenal writer, highly intelligent, and an openly gay black man in a time where that was almost unheard of. The reason I chose Cullen for this week’s post was because I loved the quote I heard in class and I found it in Countee Cullen: A Renaissance Poet by Jasmin Williams, an article that celebrates his life and some of his work.
In this article, William quotes Cullen from the Brooklyn Eagle where he says, ” If I am going to be a poet at all, I am going to be POET and not NEGRO POET. This is what has hindered the development of artists among us. Their one note has been the concern with their race.” (Williams). I could not agree more with this statement. While many black writers from the early 1900s, such as Langston Hughes, took rightful pride in their work, I feel like they were not seeing themselves as a whole with the rest of America. And because black writers were separated from other (predominately white) writers, it was that much more significant to be labeled a black poet. But this bold statement that Cullen said about not wanting to be labeled as a black poet is not showing disrespect towards his race, but rather, enveloping it into the world of writing as a whole. I love it because Cullen is saying this talent has no color and no boundaries. That we are one, essentially, and when you read his work, you’re seeing the pure talent on paper and nothing more (at least nothing in a derogatory sense), and other black writers should see themselves that way as well.
Cullen continues with, ” But what I mean is this: I shall not write of negro subjects for the purpose of propaganda. That is not what a poet is concerned with. ” (Williams). I love the use of the word “propaganda” in this quote. It clearly shows that Cullen is well aware of the influence his writing has on different audiences, be it whatever race they are and how they perceive it. He would have a responsibility to uphold if he is always labeled a black poet, as if he represents all of Black America. Even though we know this clearly isn’t the case. No one man can represent all of his race, but can only add to that of the entirety of the human race. Which is the point I feel like Cullen is trying to make. That he is his own self. He is a poet, not wanting to be defined solely by his race, but by his incredible talent. But in America today, do we still use race as a way of describing artists, writers, and entertainers? And if we are initially “blinded” by that racial profile, how does that influence the way we see them?
Works Cited
Williams, Jasmin K. “Countee Cullen: A Renaissance Poet.” New York Amsterdam News, Apr, 2012, pp. 28. ProQuest, https://login.proxy055.nclive.org/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1010939571?accountid=10616.
Hi Zena, I agree with your idea of other black poets somewhat creating a barrier from black poets and the rest of the world. While it’s completely understandable and obvious that they drew pride and strength from being black, I think Cullen saw that that would only create more of a separation between blacks and whites at the time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really understand the whole “one person representing their entire group” thing as it’s something frequently told by my parents to me. I have to be a good representation of other people who fit under the labels I have as to avoid negatively harming the group as whole if I make a bad impression on one person.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really feel that statement black writer where not seeing themselves as a whole with the rest of America which is good because they created a lane of there own and some people cant see the art they create as a whole because there blinded.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like the word “I am going to be POET and not NEGRO POET”, too. But there are two questions. The cornerstone of Cullen’s aesthetic was within English conventions. Isn’t this a cultural assimilation? He blamed others for their “nebulous atavistic yearnings toward an African inheritance” and called for African American poets to work conservatively as he did. Then what about the African inheritance? Fortunately, his behavior deviated from his theory; he, indeed, was a racial poet writing racial poems.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are you saying Cullen should’ve sought out for his African inheritance? I would think being labeled a black poet is the inheritance that still puts him inside a box.
LikeLike
And I like Cullen because of his effort to keep the sincerity in his writing. At this point, Hurston made a good comment in her letter to Cullen. “You have written from within rather than to catch the eye of those who were making the loudest noise for the moment,” Hurston wrote. “I know that hitch-hiking on bandwagons has become the rage among Negro artists for the last ten years at least, but I have never thumbed a ride and can feel no admiration for those who travel that way.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
This was a fun post to read. I totally agree with you on your points about Cullen being a genius and how it is good that he was able to distinguish himself as a poet without working under such a narrow idea of what his blackness meant. However, Cullen came from a background that allowed him many cultural privileges that weren’t shared by many of his peers, and certainly not the majority of the blacks at the time. To that note I respect his work all the more because he stuck to his truth and identity as a writer despite the lack of support from his own community.
LikeLike